Since the announcement of Governor Sarah Palin as the Republican's Vice Presidential nominee, I have been astounded by the "dirt digging" that has occurred regarding her background as the Governor of Alaska and the Mayor of Wasilla. I completely understand that a candidate, who will be a heartbeat away from the Presidency of the United States, needs to be fully vetted. However, I think the media has gone overboard.
And, it is not just happening with Governor Palin. The same scrutiny has been given to the Republican's Presidential nominee, Senator John McCain, the Democrat's Presidential nominee, Senator Barrack Obama, and their Vice-Presidential nominee, Senator Joe Biden. Even Senator Hillary Clinton was subject to the media probings when she was campaigning prior to losing her party's nomination.
Some of the information is enlightening and speaks to the character of the individual, which is important when a person is vying for the highest office in the United States. Personally, I don't want someone as President of the United States who is a not truthful - I want someone who tells it like it is. Heck, we all make mistakes. But, do they own up to them?
Can you imagine as a job search candidate going through the same intensive "vetting" process? Now, I do believe background checks are essential to ensure job seekers have good character and will work hard. But, the current political race for the Presidency begs the question of "how far is too far?"
Let's pretend that media "vetted" the candidates all the way back to kindergarten to determine their suitability for President / Vice President. Here is how I would see the situation (this is all in fun without prejudice):
Media calls the candidate's kindergarten teachers:
How was Barrack in class? Did he line up properly or was he constantly not walking in a straight line? Did he share with the other children? Was he a line-leader in class or was he constantly in time-out for bad behavior?
Did Sarah stay in her centers during learning time? Which centers did she choose? Did she learn the concepts at a faster rate than the other children? Did she see you as an "authority figure"and obey your rules or buck the system?
Did John frequently ask for bathroom breaks? Did he sit down on the bus or was he always rowdy? Was he a leader or a follower? Did he use the scissors to cut perfect circles or was he always "cutting his own shapes?"
Did Joe follow the classroom rules? Did he share his lunch with other students? Did Joe paint people or trees during art class? Did he observe the quiet rules in the library?
Now, I know this sounds silly to most people. However, most people's personality traits and character are formed by ages 5-7. It would be interesting to know the answers to these questions, wouldn't it?
I better be careful - the media might take my idea and run with it!

Kathy,
Good post and found the idea humorous.
Our company feels the same way when it comes to job seekers having to prove their credentials over and over again throughout their career. For that reason, we invented a background checking service that specifically lets the job seeker have more control over the process. Would like to hear your thoughts on it one day...
Posted by: Background Check | February 07, 2009 at 09:12 PM
Thank you for sharing the article, "The Ultimate Background Check!"... Its really very informative...
Posted by: Alex22 | September 16, 2008 at 10:39 PM